Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
1.
Arch Dis Child ; 107(3): e13, 2022 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1484003

ABSTRACT

Around the UK, commissioners have different models for delivering NHS 111, General Practice (GP) out-of-hours and urgent care services, focusing on telephony to help deliver urgent and emergency care. During the (early phases of the) COVID-19 pandemic, NHS 111 experienced an unprecedented volume of calls. At any time, 25%-30% of calls relate to children and young people (CYP). In response, the CYP's Transformation and Integrated Urgent Care teams at NHS England and NHS Improvement (NHSE/I) assisted in redeploying volunteer paediatricians into the integrated urgent care NHS 111 Clinical Assessment Services (CAS), taking calls about CYP. From this work, key stakeholders developed a paediatric 111 consultation framework, as well as learning outcomes, key capabilities and illustrations mapped against the Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health (RCPCH) Progress curriculum domains, to aid paediatricians in training to undertake NHS 111 activities. These learning outcomes and key capabilities have been endorsed by the RCPCH Curriculum Review Group and are recommended to form part of the integrated urgent care service specification and workforce blueprint to improve outcomes for CYP.


Subject(s)
After-Hours Care/organization & administration , Ambulatory Care/organization & administration , COVID-19/epidemiology , Pandemics , Pediatrics/organization & administration , Referral and Consultation/organization & administration , Curriculum , Humans , Pediatrics/education , Pilot Projects , SARS-CoV-2 , State Medicine , Telephone , United Kingdom/epidemiology
2.
Archives of Disease in Childhood ; 106(Suppl 1):A348-A349, 2021.
Article in English | ProQuest Central | ID: covidwho-1443509

ABSTRACT

BackgroundTelemedicine is increasingly used internationally to provide clinical services when patient and clinician are not in the same room. In anticipation of limited physical capacity to meet patient activity within our Paediatric Emergency Department (PED) during the Covid-19 pandemic, we developed a video-consultation urgent care model. We describe the process developed, results and lessons learned from a proof of concept trial.ObjectivesAs an innovative model for the UK we sought to test feasibility, safety and acceptability for clinicians, patients and carers at a type 1 PED.MethodsOur model was developed by our clinical, IM&T and Innovation teams following workshops with colleagues delivering similar models internationally. The trial was conducted over 4 weeks on non-consecutive days based on the availability of trial clinicians who were senior PEM-trained clinicians. Patients who did not require immediate resuscitation based on our usual nurse eyeball assessment were invited to participate in a video-consultation trial. Carers who volunteered were registered on the hospital Patient Administration System (PAS) and received an automated text message link to join a video-consultation on NHS Attend Anywhere using their own device. The clinician was based remotely on a video-equipped laptop or desktop. The patient did not have any triage or physiological observations measured prior to video-consult. A range of outcomes was available to clinician and carer as described in the Results. Clinicians documented directly into the PAS.Clinician and patient-carer feedback was solicited at the end of consultations.Results31 patients were seen. Age range 1 month – 15 years;12 female: 19 male.Presenting complaints included rash, headache – both new and chronic, cough, sore throat, difficulty breathing, diarrhoea or vomiting, eye conditions, allergy, suspected UTI, musculoskeletal complaints and injuries.25% (8 patients) were brought to ED for further action: 4 patients for x-ray or physical examination;2 for urine dipstick and 2 to issue a prescription.1 patient (3.2%) returned within 7 days with same problem with overnight admission for observation only. This is comparable to our usual re-attender rate. Clinical assessment and advice during video consult was reviewed and deemed appropriate.There were no other unplanned returns in the 2 weeks following initial attendance.Feedback suggests video-consultation is acceptable to carers, especially when waiting times are long.Conclusions75% of patients were safely managed with verbal advice only. Of those that needed to attend the PED for investigation or prescription, local options could be implemented to reduce need to travel.Virtual urgent care is feasible, safe and acceptable for clinicians and carers of infants, children and young people. Based on the range of presenting complaints seen during the trial, a significant proportion of attendances to our type 1 PED could be effectively managed through this model.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL